Absolutely not — it doesn't make any sense to imagine ${undefdet_head} ${head} which ${be} ${relatedto_modifier} ${modifier}
No — it is weird to imagine ${undefdet_head} ${head} which ${be} ${relatedto_modifier} ${modifier} , even if the meaning is understandable
Not really — the meaning of ${compound} is associated with ${undefdet_head} ${head} and with ${something_modifier} ${modifier} , but only in an indirect manner
Sort of — the meaning of ${compound} is directly associated with ${undefdet_head} ${head} and ${something_modifier} ${modifier} , even if these meanings are not identical
Yes — ${undefdet_compound} ${compound} ${be} actually ${undefdet_head} ${head} which ${be} ${relatedto_modifier} ${modifier}
Exactly! — ${undefdet_compound} ${compound} ${be} always literally ${undefdet_head} ${head} which ${be} ${relatedto_modifier} ${modifier}